W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:35:36 +0200
Message-ID: <4A840898.1070706@gmx.de>
To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Shelley Powers wrote:
> ...
> It seems like, from what you are saying, is that a Formal Objection is 
> more along the lines of giving a sense of openness within the W3C, but 
> the openness is more of an illusion than fact.
> I understand about presenting a technical argument, but if all the WG 
> has to do is "claim" that it gave due consideration to the  technical 
> issues raised, then there is no real option. After all, this WG believes 
> it is giving due consideration to the summary attribute, or the 
 > ...

No, the WG does not believe that. At least not as far as I am concerned.

> ...

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 12:36:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:49 UTC