- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:39:30 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Manu Sporny<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > You and Ian are questioning my motives for asking for the HTML5-warnings > document to be published as a WD. Rather than let you assert what my > intentions are, we should address these dubious claims head on: > > Ian Hickson wrote: >>> html5-warnings-diff.html#microdata >> >>Here I think we see the real reason you are doing this. > ... >> Henri Sivonen wrote: >> It seems to me the idea of the draft is to deliver >> html5-warnings-diff.html#microdata > > Both of you are out of line. > > You are also flat out wrong. It is no surprise that the HTML5 > specification doesn't have more editors if even warnings about spec > language is met with these types of accusations. You undermine the HTML5 > effort by doing so. For the record I agree that those comments were not helpful and would have strongly preferred if they had been left out. That said, I do agree with Maciej that the current set of warnings seem very arbitrary and would like to see some sort hard and fast rule. For example I think it would be better to mark up things that have turned into perma-threads, rather than attempting to mark up ones that might turn into perma-threads. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 17:40:33 UTC