W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

RE: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll - update

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Cc: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@opera.com>, "'Leif Halvard Silli'" <lhs@malform.no>
Message-ID: <00c701ca12da$6b85ecf0$4291c6d0$@edu>
Sam Ruby wrote
> Sam Ruby wrote:
> > Given the number of objections, I don't believe that they can all be
> > resolved by Monday, so here are the options I have heard so far.
> >
> >  1) Publish Ian's draft as is, along with the HTML 5 differences
> >     from HTML 4. [SR]
> >  3) Publish Ian's draft, the HTML 5 differences from HTML 4, and
> >     Mike's draft. [LM, JF1]
> >  4) Instruct Mike Smith to work with Ian to incorporate [text to
> >     be provided by John Foliot] into Ian's draft [JF2]
> Unless I'm misreading, the number of poll options have gone from 5 to 3
> (I very much like the direction this is taking!).  I base this on the
> following emails (people are welcome to correct me if I got this
> wrong)...
> Dropping 2:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0938.html
> Dropping 5:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0940.html


Given Mike's indication that he is not prepared to offer his draft for
consideration at this time
[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0012.html ] I
withdraw my first objection (noted above as [JF1]) at this time.

The editor has signaled that he is willing to act upon my other objection
[JF2] and it is my impression that I will be able to remove my second
objection as well.

Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 19:02:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:43 GMT