- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Shelley Powers'" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > > Having said this, John, I would hope that you don't try to hurry > through a change document reflecting a more comprehensive view of > summary, just because of a request for publishing a new Working Draft. My request for more accuracy surrounding @summary is being acted upon by the editor, with some further clarification requested and provided. At this writing I believe that I will be in a position to remove my objection before Monday. I am not requesting that the draft decide the outcome of @summary, but to reflect that it is in an active state of discussion (which has partially emerged today), and that the language that contradicts WCAG 2 be set aside until such time as a decision is reached. > In a way, a new Working Draft could be good for those who are > interested in change, because it provides a stable point we can use > for edits for other proposed sections, or even all new documents. I agree, especially given what appears to be divergent paths emerging. > > Now, I may not have support from three working group members, > but I'll still make the proposal, as a matter of form, and as a basis > for future actions. Shelly I would be happy to assist you here if you wish, and I am sure that others would likely also step forward to offer input and support if you so wish. We can follow up offline. JF
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 18:46:18 UTC