- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:05:13 -0500
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- CC: 'Shelley Powers' <shelley.just@gmail.com>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, 'Sam Ruby' <rubys@intertwingly.net>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>
John Foliot wrote: > Shelley Powers wrote: > >> Having said this, John, I would hope that you don't try to hurry >> through a change document reflecting a more comprehensive view of >> summary, just because of a request for publishing a new Working Draft. >> > > My request for more accuracy surrounding @summary is being acted upon by > the editor, with some further clarification requested and provided. At > this writing I believe that I will be in a position to remove my objection > before Monday. I am not requesting that the draft decide the outcome of > @summary, but to reflect that it is in an active state of discussion > (which has partially emerged today), and that the language that > contradicts WCAG 2 be set aside until such time as a decision is reached. > > Yes, I see the additional text at http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#obsolete >> In a way, a new Working Draft could be good for those who are >> interested in change, because it provides a stable point we can use >> for edits for other proposed sections, or even all new documents. >> > > I agree, especially given what appears to be divergent paths emerging. > > >> Now, I may not have support from three working group members, >> but I'll still make the proposal, as a matter of form, and as a basis >> for future actions. >> > > Shelly I would be happy to assist you here if you wish, and I am sure that > others would likely also step forward to offer input and support if you so > wish. We can follow up offline. > > > JF > > Shelley
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 20:06:08 UTC