W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [DRAFT] Heartbeat poll

From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:05:13 -0500
Message-ID: <4A749FF9.5020000@burningbird.net>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
CC: 'Shelley Powers' <shelley.just@gmail.com>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, 'Sam Ruby' <rubys@intertwingly.net>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>
John Foliot wrote:
> Shelley Powers wrote:
>> Having said this, John, I would hope that you don't try to hurry
>> through a change document reflecting a more comprehensive view of
>> summary, just because of a request for publishing a new Working Draft.
> My request for more accuracy surrounding @summary is being acted upon by
> the editor, with some further clarification requested and provided.  At
> this writing I believe that I will be in a position to remove my objection
> before Monday.  I am not requesting that the draft decide the outcome of
> @summary, but to reflect that it is in an active state of discussion
> (which has partially emerged today), and that the language that
> contradicts WCAG 2 be set aside until such time as a decision is reached.

Yes, I see the additional text at


>> In a way, a new Working Draft could be good for those who are
>> interested in change, because it provides a stable point we can use
>> for edits for other proposed sections, or even all new documents.
> I agree, especially given what appears to be divergent paths emerging.
>> Now, I may not have support from three working group members,
>> but I'll still make the proposal, as a matter of form, and as a basis
>> for future actions.
> Shelly I would be happy to assist you here if you wish, and I am sure that
> others would likely also step forward to offer input and support if you so
> wish.  We can follow up offline.
> JF

Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 20:06:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:49 UTC