W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2008

RE: heads-up about "new" URLs section in HTML5 editor's draft

From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:19:41 -0400
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <014f01c8d882$5e494f70$1adbee50$@com>

>> Somebody suggested "HTML URL" on uri@w3.org - I think that's a better
>> option because its makes the distinction more apparent.

> So far that's the best candidate I have heard of.

Most people can't tell the difference between a URI and a URL and use the
terms interchangeably. Heck, I can barely discern the distinction most of
the time. Do we really want to make things even more confusing?

Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 18:21:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:35 UTC