RE: heads-up about "new" URLs section in HTML5 editor's draft

>> Somebody suggested "HTML URL" on uri@w3.org - I think that's a better
>> option because its makes the distinction more apparent.

> So far that's the best candidate I have heard of.

Most people can't tell the difference between a URI and a URL and use the
terms interchangeably. Heck, I can barely discern the distinction most of
the time. Do we really want to make things even more confusing?

J.Ja