Re: heads-up about "new" URLs section in HTML5 editor's draft

Justin James wrote:
>>> Somebody suggested "HTML URL" on uri@w3.org - I think that's a better
>>> option because its makes the distinction more apparent.
> 
>> So far that's the best candidate I have heard of.
> 
> Most people can't tell the difference between a URI and a URL and use the
> terms interchangeably. Heck, I can barely discern the distinction most of
> the time. Do we really want to make things even more confusing?

You mean, more confusing than calling things a URL which are not URLs, 
let alone URIs?

BR, Julian