W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2008

Re[2]: acceptance: how

From: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:30:37 +0200
Message-ID: <1732095390.20080226083037@narod.ru>
To: public-html@w3.org

Dan,

DC> "We expect that typically, an editor makes an initial proposal, which is
DC> refined in discussion with Working Group members and other reviewers,
DC> and consensus emerges with little formal decision-making."
DC>    -- http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#decisions

There is link
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#Votes
on mentioned page (and note: "This charter is written in accordance with
Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C Process Document and includes _no_ voting
procedures beyond what the Process Document requires").

1) Can i put on voting my proposals about new controls
http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/tabfile_eng.htm
http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/cube_eng.htm
http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/quest_eng.htm
?

2) I'm invited expert, and i'd like to know, am i "Good Standing"
to participate in voting?



Dmitry Turin
HTML6     (6. 5.4)  http://html60.euro.ru
SQL5      (5.11.3)  http://sql50.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7. 2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2. 0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 06:28:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:12 GMT