- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:25:07 +0100
- To: "James Graham" <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, "Richard Schwerdtfeger" <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:15:11 +0100, James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: >> One alternative does not fit all even though a fallback may be an >> improvement for some. >> I am concerned that we would advocate using canvas over SVG where we >> would have an opportunity to apply semantics to the base drawing, > > I don't think we would advocate <canvas> where a more appropriate > technology exists, only where it makes sense. This is in fact what the _second_ paragraph of the <canvas> section says: "Authors SHOULD NOT use the canvas element in a document when a more suitable element is available." -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 14:24:58 UTC