W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2007

Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:50:43 -0500
Message-ID: <4730A973.3070306@w3.org>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: HTML Issue Tracking WG <public-html@w3.org>

Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> Versioning and profiling seems to be the common issue throughout WGs.
> 
> In SMIL3.0 we defined version and baseProfile attributes similarly to
> SVG.
> XHTML has version attribute, but seems not to have profile.
> 
> Would it be possible to have one mechanism for all those specs?

possible? I don't know. I'm not even sure it's likely
to be cost-effective.

It is possible to have one discussion about them; the TAG
is trying to do just that.

XMLVersioning-41
What are good practices for designing extensible XMLlanguages and for 
handling versioning?
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/41

Note the poximity to...

ultimateQuestion-42
What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/42

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:50:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:09 GMT