W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2007

RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements]

From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:17:28 +0100
Message-ID: <78BEBE845AB46D4789206C4DBB3A969C930024@obeex01.obe.access-company.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>

Versioning and profiling seems to be the common issue throughout WGs.

In SMIL3.0 we defined version and baseProfile attributes similarly to
SVG.
XHTML has version attribute, but seems not to have profile.

Would it be possible to have one mechanism for all those specs?

Kind regards,
Marcin

-----Original Message-----
From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Dan Connolly
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:16 PM
To: HTML Issue Tracking WG
Subject: Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs
[HTML Principles/Requirements]


HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker wrote:
> ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML
Principles/Requirements]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/
> 
> Raised by: Dan Connolly

I asked that this issue be migrated from the wiki
( http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ARIAIntegration ) because
it has come up in the ARIA session discussion.

http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/meetings/tp2007

minutes/notes to appear near http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-aria-irc



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 17:18:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:50 UTC