- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 01:31:16 -0700
- To: Alan Dean <alan.dean@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
<style scoped> would handle this use case. A feed aggregator that did the stitching together of multiple feeds would want to add the scoped attribute if missing to any <style> elements from individual feed fragments anyway (to avoid style collisions between different feeds). The "stitching together" use case is where scoped style really shines. I am proposing that <style scoped> would still be conformant if used outside the <head>, but that an unscoped <style> would not (because of its dangerous property of applying to the entire page content, which is virtually never what the author actually intended). dave On May 27, 2007, at 1:23 AM, Alan Dean wrote: > Dave, > > If I understand the nature of the markup constraint that you request, > would this not make html5 fragments much harder to work with, in the > context of RSS / Atom / etc feeds? The author does not control the > <head> element in that case, and so would be unable to apply any > inline styling to 'html5 conforming' fragments. Or am I missing > something? > > Regards, > Alan Dean > http://thoughtpad.net/alan-dean
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 08:55:55 UTC