- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:32:23 +0200
- To: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Olivier GENDRIN schrieb: > > I just realised that, if i wanted to indicate the copyright > information of a page, i would probably use an id="copyright" instead > of class="copyright" (or class="copy"). > > It means that if we write into stone some @class value for semantic > purpose, we should have the same list for the @id. I always prefer using ids for unique elements, so I see your point. But I'm not sure if it's worth adding to the spec. Note that chaining wouldn't work (as in "html5 copyright"), but then again, I don't like that approach anyway. > And has anyone stats about the use of class="blue" or class="title" ? > What if it's more widely used than copyright ? It isn't, see Ian's survey. But even if it was, that wouldn't matter as the goal is to standardize semantically meaningful names. --Dao
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 11:32:34 UTC