- From: Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:33:56 +0200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 2 maj 2007, at 21.29, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2007 21:24:57 +0200, Roger Johansson > <roger@456bereastreet.com> wrote: >> I am _not_ suggesting that non-conforming content is rejected, >> only that there is some way of making the user (who can then use >> that info when filing a bug report) aware that the page that they >> are having a problem with (or not) is non-conforming. If >> displaying errors at all is so horribly bad, why do browsers >> bother with JavaScript errors? > > You mean exposing them to the end user or the exceptions and such > that are part of the language? If the former, dunno. If the latter, > well, it's part of the language. I mean exposing them to the end user (if you're referring to my comparison to JavaScript). /Roger -- http://www.456bereastreet.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 19:34:03 UTC