W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Support Existing Content

From: Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:33:56 +0200
Message-Id: <C2FE8957-ED78-4EEE-AA11-A1D5CF5DBF16@456bereastreet.com>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

On 2 maj 2007, at 21.29, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 02 May 2007 21:24:57 +0200, Roger Johansson  
> <roger@456bereastreet.com> wrote:
>> I am _not_ suggesting that non-conforming content is rejected,  
>> only that there is some way of making the user (who can then use  
>> that info when filing a bug report) aware that the page that they  
>> are having a problem with (or not) is non-conforming. If  
>> displaying errors at all is so horribly bad, why do browsers  
>> bother with JavaScript errors?
> You mean exposing them to the end user or the exceptions and such  
> that are part of the language? If the former, dunno. If the latter,  
> well, it's part of the language.

I mean exposing them to the end user (if you're referring to my  
comparison to JavaScript).


Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 19:34:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:20 UTC