- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 21:29:44 +0200
- To: "Roger Johansson" <roger@456bereastreet.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 02 May 2007 21:24:57 +0200, Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com> wrote: > I am _not_ suggesting that non-conforming content is rejected, only that > there is some way of making the user (who can then use that info when > filing a bug report) aware that the page that they are having a problem > with (or not) is non-conforming. If displaying errors at all is so > horribly bad, why do browsers bother with JavaScript errors? You mean exposing them to the end user or the exceptions and such that are part of the language? If the former, dunno. If the latter, well, it's part of the language. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 19:29:58 UTC