Re: Support Existing Content

On 2 May 2007, at 10:28, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> In fact, I thought the HTML WG was about incremental evolution of  
> HTML as opposed to breaking backwards compatibility for no good  
> reason. (This is certainly true for the WHATWG, which is way some  
> of your comments there may have been dismissed.)
>
I suppose your definition of a good reason differs from mine. I want  
to fix the web, and make it a better place for authors and for  
renderers, that is my reason.
I guess HTML, or certainly the next evolution of it is going to  
persist with the problems that dog it today.

Fine. I think today will be my last day on the list.

Thanks

Gareth