- From: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:28:56 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 2 May 2007, at 10:28, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > In fact, I thought the HTML WG was about incremental evolution of > HTML as opposed to breaking backwards compatibility for no good > reason. (This is certainly true for the WHATWG, which is way some > of your comments there may have been dismissed.) > I suppose your definition of a good reason differs from mine. I want to fix the web, and make it a better place for authors and for renderers, that is my reason. I guess HTML, or certainly the next evolution of it is going to persist with the problems that dog it today. Fine. I think today will be my last day on the list. Thanks Gareth
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 10:29:04 UTC