Le 16 mars 2007 à 08:42, Laurens Holst a écrit : > I mean, this is ****ing expensive software we’re talking about > (pardon my language), which has to work its ways around various > linguistic problems. Abbreviations seem to be one of the lesser > problematic ones, and they have budget to solve it. People pay for > these problems to be solved by their software, and those companies > are not going to depend on that 99% of the web suddenly getting > enlightenment and starting to add <abbr> tags to their web pages > for their solution. Could someone or a team of two persons come up with a list of all "possible" test cases using - abbr - acronym in different languages? Posting the list of test cases to the public-html mailing list, so we have something handy to test through - browsers - search engines - screen readers - automatic translators -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 00:43:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 March 2007 00:43:16 GMT