On 2011-11-04 16:34, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:21:50 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre > <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote: >> [...] > > The outcome you sketch will also result in all other W3C specifications > to be implemented by browsers (and even HTTP if it were to be defined in > a non-fiction manner) depend on HTML for its definition of URL processing. Please stop the "fiction" rhetoric. There's also a lot of fiction in HTML5 (such as requiring rewriting of \ for all URI schemes), and I don't see you arguing about *that*. I do agree that URIs leak, but that doesn't necessarily mean that we can have the same processing requirements everywhere. For instance, there are cases where whitespace acts as a delimiter and thus will not be accepted as URI character, no matter how much you want it to. > ... Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 4 November 2011 15:50:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 November 2011 15:50:43 GMT