- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:18:43 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240 --- Comment #73 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2011-11-04 11:18:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #72) > > I added the TrackerRequest keyword so here are 2 issues I see along with > suggested titles. > > "Handling of machine-readable data in HTML5" - This issue would include adding > a data element, if the time element should be kept or not (and how it could be > improved if it is kept in the spec), if the pubdate attribute should be kept, > and if microdata can share some element/attribute with RDFa relating to > machine-readable data. Can that be split into smaller issues? > "Keeping HTML5 neutral about Microdata/RDFa" - Should the HTML5 specification > contain things like schema.org microdata examples. And if that is OK should the > spec also include RDFa examples of the same thing? Or maybe these examples > should go in a separate document. Once the change is reverted, is that an issue that would apply to the document as it exists at that time? See also the following decisions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0586.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/att-0218/issue-76-decision.html - Sam Ruby -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 11:18:51 UTC