W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 13240] Consider replacing <time> with <data>

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:18:43 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RMHnH-00069v-B3@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240

--- Comment #73 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2011-11-04 11:18:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #72)
> 
> I added the TrackerRequest keyword so here are 2 issues I see along with
> suggested titles.
> 
> "Handling of machine-readable data in HTML5" - This issue would include adding
> a data element, if the time element should be kept or not (and how it could be
> improved if it is kept in the spec), if the pubdate attribute should be kept,
> and if microdata can share some element/attribute with RDFa relating to
> machine-readable data.

Can that be split into smaller issues?

> "Keeping HTML5 neutral about Microdata/RDFa" - Should the HTML5 specification
> contain things like schema.org microdata examples. And if that is OK should the
> spec also include RDFa examples of the same thing? Or maybe these examples
> should go in a separate document.

Once the change is reverted, is that an issue that would apply to the document
as it exists at that time?  See also the following decisions:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0586.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/att-0218/issue-76-decision.html

- Sam Ruby

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 11:18:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 November 2011 11:18:52 GMT