W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 13240] Consider replacing <time> with <data>

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:43:01 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RMHEj-0004cw-Mh@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240

--- Comment #72 from Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com> 2011-11-04 10:42:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #71)
> Revert request is here:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0011.html
> 
> At this point, we are looking to create one or more issues and soliciting
> proposals on each.  We are looking for suggested title and text for the tracker
> issue(s).

(In reply to comment #71)
> Revert request is here:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0011.html
> 
> At this point, we are looking to create one or more issues and soliciting
> proposals on each.  We are looking for suggested title and text for the tracker
> issue(s).

I added the TrackerRequest keyword so here are 2 issues I see along with
suggested titles.

"Handling of machine-readable data in HTML5" - This issue would include adding
a data element, if the time element should be kept or not (and how it could be
improved if it is kept in the spec), if the pubdate attribute should be kept,
and if microdata can share some element/attribute with RDFa relating to
machine-readable data.

"Keeping HTML5 neutral about Microdata/RDFa" - Should the HTML5 specification
contain things like schema.org microdata examples. And if that is OK should the
spec also include RDFa examples of the same thing? Or maybe these examples
should go in a separate document.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 10:43:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 November 2011 10:43:05 GMT