- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:34:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12734 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2011-05-30 21:34:34 UTC --- Via other bugs the text now makes clear that any feature addition should preferably be preflighted with the WG, and any feature addition (even where its feature status is debatable) could be subject to a revert request. Anything that no one objects to will not get reverted. In that sense, any change is ok as long as it proves uncontroversial ex post facto (no one asks to revert), but we strongly recommend that anything which is even arguably a feature addition, even to document longstanding legacy APIs, should be suitably preflighted with the group. Not just in a letter-of-the-law way but a bug or mailing list post with fair opportunity for comments. I think this is now clear enough from the rest of the policy. If my co-chairs agree, my resolution would be to simply remove the remaining FIXME. I'd also like to give Aryeh a chance to comment on whether his concerns are addressed now. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 21:34:37 UTC