- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:41:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12734
Summary: Clarify what types of changes can be made outside the
decision process
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: working group Decision Policy
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com,
rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org
Aryeh Gregor writes:
-----------
I notice that there's nothing specific about what changes the editor
is allowed to make, beyond "Although editors may field issues through
other forums if they wish, we will require editors to address all
bugzilla bugs." Does this mean that there are no specific limitations
on what changes the editor can make, or just that this document
doesn't cover them? In particular, I'd like to know whether the
editor will remain free to make substantive changes provided they
prove uncontroversial -- except if they would force us to return to
Working Draft, of course. For example, adding a specification for a
previously-undocumented JavaScript property where no one but
implementers is likely to care about the details of how it's
specified.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 07:41:23 UTC