- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:41:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12734 Summary: Clarify what types of changes can be made outside the decision process Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org Aryeh Gregor writes: ----------- I notice that there's nothing specific about what changes the editor is allowed to make, beyond "Although editors may field issues through other forums if they wish, we will require editors to address all bugzilla bugs." Does this mean that there are no specific limitations on what changes the editor can make, or just that this document doesn't cover them? In particular, I'd like to know whether the editor will remain free to make substantive changes provided they prove uncontroversial -- except if they would force us to return to Working Draft, of course. For example, adding a specification for a previously-undocumented JavaScript property where no one but implementers is likely to care about the details of how it's specified. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 07:41:23 UTC