- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:07:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13871 --- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> 2011-08-23 16:07:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why? It seems more predictable if setting currentTime always does the same > thing. Otherwise scripted UIs that depend on the seeked event being fired after > currentTime is set would fail at random when the user happens to seek to a time > that is the same as currentTime. i notice this when running basic API tests on audio/video element interfaces to verify mutability of non-readonly IDL attributes, which in this case, basically reduced to: e = document.createElement('video'); e.currentTime = e.currentTime; the second statement results in an INVALID_STATE_ERROR exception because, in this devolutionary case, (1) e.controller is null (no controller), and (2) e.readyState == HAVE_NOTHING part of the problem here is that "new playback position" is not well defined, since it can mean "new, different playback position" or "new, not necessarily different playback position"; i would also note that step (7) under 4.8.10.9, may result in an non-exception raising abort of the seek without firing a seeking event; this would occur "If there are no ranges given in the seekable attribute then set the seeking IDL attribute to false and abort these steps." i would propose doing the following: (1) defining "new playback position" as "new, different playback position", where different means != the current playback position as denoted (synchronically at set time) by the current value of currentTime; (2) modify step (1) under 4.8.10.9 to read as follows: "If the media element's readyState is HAVE_NOTHING, then (1) if the new playback position is the same as the current playback position, abort these steps; otherwise (2) raise an INVALID_STATE_ERR exception (if the seek was in response to a DOM method call or setting of an IDL attribute), and abort these steps." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 16:07:10 UTC