- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:40:11 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13814 Summary: Permit @alt on <area> even when there is no @href attribute Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-map-element#the-area- element OS/Version: Mac System 9.x Status: NEW Keywords: a11y Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org REQUEST: Make @alt permitted on <area> even when there is no @href attribute. USECASE: An area of an image map might be in need of alternative text even if it is not clickable. For example, a link might simply not be available when the map is created. Or there might be a section of the image that needs alternative text, without ever becoming a link (for instance because the iamge consists of two or more images that visually looks like separate images but which, from the computer's point of view, is a single image). OTHER JUSTIFICATIONS: * FIRSTLY: HTML4 had this feature. HTML4 justified it by saying (or rather *showing*) that <a coords="1,2,3,4" >FOO</a> (that is: an anchor element without @href) is conceptually equal to an <area nohref coords="1,2,3,4" alt=FOO > without @href. ( See text to the last code example in HTML4, section 13.6.1.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#h-13.6.1.1>. ) * SECONDLY: HTML5 emphasizes thtat <area> is a link element, just like <a>. Thus when HTML5 says that an <a> without @href ""represents a placeholder for where a link might otherwise have been placed, if it had been relevant", it makes sense to say the same thing about an <area> without @href too. In that regard: HTML5 has not included @coords for the <a> element - which is yet another reason to make sure that <area> and <a> really remains conceptually equal also in their ability contain text that is a *potential link*. * THIRDLY: There seems to be demand for such a thing: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2011Aug/0024.html -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 02:40:15 UTC