- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:28:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10455 Summary: Mint a describedby attribute for the img element Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#t he-img-element OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: a11y, a11y_text-alt Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org HTML5 fails to adequately provide the functions that had been provided through the longdesc HTML 4 attribute. Those functions are: 1. A direct, reusable programmatically associated mechanism to a long description of an image without a forced visual encumbrance or default visual indicator. 2. A method to reference a longer description of an image, without including the content in the main flow of a page. Many images cannot be sufficiently described with other long description techniques. For instance, longdesc currently provides a solution for describing the content of images to the blind when it would be: * Visually apparent and redundant to a sighted person. * Unacceptable to the marketing department due to aesthetic considerations. Artists, designers and marketers do not want their visual designs changed/ruined; whether that's with visible link text or a disclosure widget. There is currently absolutely no direct way of doing that. PURPOSE The purpose of describedby would be to describe an image to people who can not see. It is an accommodation for the blind and visually impaired. It's aim is to provide what the visual provides. Like the HTML4 longdesc attribute a correct and proper describedby is redundant for people who have sight. USE CASES * Data Visualization i.e. charts and graphs * Diagrams * Cartoons, drawings, illustrations, etc REQUIREMENTS 1. A programmatic mechanism to reference a specific a structured description, internal or external to the document. 2. A way to inform users and authors that a description is present/available via user agent (UAs could provide an option to reveal the content of describedby via a context menu, preference, or switch etc.). This also affords a practical method for the curious and for developers who want a tool to check the describedby descriptive content and keep it up to date. 3. A device independent way to access the descriptive content. 4. An explicit provision that accessing descriptive content, whether internal or external to the document containing the image, does NOT take the user away from the user's position in the document containing the image where the verbose descriptor was invoked. 5. A way to provide user control over exposition of the descriptor so that rendering of the image and its description is not an either/or proposition. A visual indicator of the description should NOT be a forced visual encumbrance on sighted users by default. 6. A method to reference a longer description of an image, without including the content in the main flow of a page. REFERENCES: Examples of longdesc in the Wild with No Visual Link Text Clutter http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/LongdescRetention#Examples_with_No_Visual_Link_Text_Clutter longdesc in HTML 4.01 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#adef-longdesc-IMG -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 12:28:17 UTC