Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) from Glenn Adams on 2013-01-29 (public-html-admin@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:50:22 -0700
To: ifette@google.com
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com)" <ddorwin@google.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+ckecxNBkW-peq=PzoSkXB-n_23LLJ+0K7tBoX923KHLA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com>wrote:

> Robert, I agree with your objectives and personally would support them but
> I don't support the objection as I don't believe that advancement to FPWD
> should be a time for people to demand resolution on particular issues. LC
> or CR sure, but not on FPWD. It's a procedural thing for me.

What is the official Google position on EME? Does Google intend to deploy
EME in Chrome? Has Google determined which CDMs it will initially support?

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 22:51:10 UTC