W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > January 2013

Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:50:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+ckecxNBkW-peq=PzoSkXB-n_23LLJ+0K7tBoX923KHLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ifette@google.com
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com)" <ddorwin@google.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com>wrote:

> Robert, I agree with your objectives and personally would support them but
> I don't support the objection as I don't believe that advancement to FPWD
> should be a time for people to demand resolution on particular issues. LC
> or CR sure, but not on FPWD. It's a procedural thing for me.


What is the official Google position on EME? Does Google intend to deploy
EME in Chrome? Has Google determined which CDMs it will initially support?
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 22:51:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 January 2013 22:51:10 GMT