- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:21:10 -0700
- To: Gez Lemon <g.lemon@webprofession.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Sep 17, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Gez Lemon <g.lemon@webprofession.com> wrote: > On 17 September 2012 22:30, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 17, 2012, at 13:58 , Gez Lemon <g.lemon@webprofession.com> wrote: >> >>> I support the change proposal, as there is no other reliable method >>> that is supported today that does the same thing as longdesc. >> >> The trouble is, longdesc is neither widely supported nor reliable today. If it was, I suspect that we would not be having this discussion. > > It is better supported and more reliable than no solution at all for > providing a long description for complex images. Here are six examples. Three of which work today. One which works in all implementations, which is more than can be said of longdesc. http://cookiecrook.com/longdesc/
Received on Saturday, 22 September 2012 01:21:37 UTC