W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Minutes for 10 May TF Teleconference

From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:21:48 -0400
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120511232148.GD4315@sonata.rednote.net>
Silvia Pfeiffer writes:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> > Hi, Silvia:
> >
> > Silvia Pfeiffer writes:
> >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> >> > Minutes from the HTML-A11Y Task Force teleconference of 10 May are provided below in text and are available as hypertext at:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html
> >> >
> >>
> >> [..]
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Media Accessibility User Requirements, annotations/pointers to spec
> >> >
> >> >   <JF> scribe: JF
> >> >
> >> >   JS: have been meaning to surface this for some time
> >> >
> >> >   would like to move the user requirements from a Draft note
> >> >
> >> >   thought it might be useful to annotate this in the HTML5 spec to link technologies to techniques (etc.)
> >> >
> >> >   Silvia offered to do this and felt it would be easy to do
> >> >
> >> >   so, do we want to take that document in that direction?
> >> >
> >> >   PF thought this was a good idea on their call yesterday
> >> >
> >> >   should we pursue?
> >> >
> >> >   (JF says +1)
> >> >
> >> >   SF: Is this annotating the HTML5 spec or the User Reqs document?
> >> >
> >> >   JS: the user reqs doc
> >> >
> >> >   MS: question seems does anyone thing this is a good idea. If Silvia has offered to do this, and it has no direct
> >> >   changes to HTML5 spec, then are there objections?
> >> >   ... seems like a useful bit of work
> >> >   ... guessing that Silvia wanted to ensure that others saw the value, and agreed before she undertook the effort
> >> >
> >> >   JF: +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks
> >> >
> >> >   <Stevef> +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks
> >> >
> >> >   JS: I will discuss this with Silvia - worth noting that the media team are re-convening on short notice - actually
> >> >   meeting later today
> >>
> >> Does this refer to creating an update of
> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/ with links to the parts
> >> in the spec that realize the different requirements?
> >
> >
> > Precisely. We discussed this briefly in email this past March. See
> > especially:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Mar/0353.html
> 
> 
> Would this require that I join another WG?

Not necessary. We can accept the additions as comments and simply add
them in.


The document will go through a Last Call following integration of all
remaining tweaks. We're still expecting tweaks from Judy for Section 1,
by the way. So, there's a way to go before we formally publish this as a
note.

Of course, if you want to join PF, we'd be delighted to have you. But, I
don't believe it's necessary.

Janina

> 
> Regards,
> Silvia.

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
		sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net

Chair, Open Accessibility	janina@a11y.org	
Linux Foundation		http://a11y.org

Chair, Protocols & Formats
Web Accessibility Initiative	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 23:22:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 May 2012 23:22:26 GMT