W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Minutes for 10 May TF Teleconference

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 07:27:23 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=+TkMp0JxOvJ+qVbRp3yP=KjhOm4GbWJ5LOs_5Wh3eRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> Hi, Silvia:
>
> Silvia Pfeiffer writes:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
>> > Minutes from the HTML-A11Y Task Force teleconference of 10 May are provided below in text and are available as hypertext at:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html
>> >
>>
>> [..]
>>
>> >
>> > Media Accessibility User Requirements, annotations/pointers to spec
>> >
>> >   <JF> scribe: JF
>> >
>> >   JS: have been meaning to surface this for some time
>> >
>> >   would like to move the user requirements from a Draft note
>> >
>> >   thought it might be useful to annotate this in the HTML5 spec to link technologies to techniques (etc.)
>> >
>> >   Silvia offered to do this and felt it would be easy to do
>> >
>> >   so, do we want to take that document in that direction?
>> >
>> >   PF thought this was a good idea on their call yesterday
>> >
>> >   should we pursue?
>> >
>> >   (JF says +1)
>> >
>> >   SF: Is this annotating the HTML5 spec or the User Reqs document?
>> >
>> >   JS: the user reqs doc
>> >
>> >   MS: question seems does anyone thing this is a good idea. If Silvia has offered to do this, and it has no direct
>> >   changes to HTML5 spec, then are there objections?
>> >   ... seems like a useful bit of work
>> >   ... guessing that Silvia wanted to ensure that others saw the value, and agreed before she undertook the effort
>> >
>> >   JF: +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks
>> >
>> >   <Stevef> +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks
>> >
>> >   JS: I will discuss this with Silvia - worth noting that the media team are re-convening on short notice - actually
>> >   meeting later today
>>
>> Does this refer to creating an update of
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/ with links to the parts
>> in the spec that realize the different requirements?
>
>
> Precisely. We discussed this briefly in email this past March. See
> especially:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Mar/0353.html


Would this require that I join another WG?

Regards,
Silvia.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 21:28:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 May 2012 21:28:14 GMT