W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > April 2012

RE: 48-Hour Consensus Call: ARIA-DescribedAT & Longdesc

From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:19:56 -0700
To: "'Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis'" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Cc: "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "'Joshue O Connor'" <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, "James Nurthen" <james.nurthen@oracle.com>, "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>
Message-ID: <000701cd12c1$d893b7c0$89bb2740$@ca>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Charles McCathieNevile
> <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> >> Until vendors widely implement @longdesc UI, it is harmful to
> suggest
> >> such authors rely on the @longdesc attribute.
> >
> > True, up to a point.
> Mmm, what point is that (for such authors)?

How about up to the point "Know your audience"? 

If I am an educational book publisher, and I know what I can and can't do to the actual text of a text-book, yet I need to also provide a longer textual description to images, then I will also know that at the receiving end of the equation the majority of users who will require the @longdesc value will both a) know that *my* e-textbooks have that feature, and b) the end users will be equipped to access that longer description.

In the academic setting I just left (after almost 6 years), I can safely report that virtually every non-sighted user I encountered on campus had and used JAWS as one of many screen readers (they often also had NVDA, and of course they used VoiceOver on the iPhones) - the point being this group of users had the software they needed to access content availed via @longdesc.  Assuming those students would want to take advantage of @longdesc congtent, they would choose the tool that gave them access to that content. The beauty of a rich tool-box is that not every problem needs to be solved with a hammer. (This holds true for both authors and consumers)

As for those users who might be sighted but also required "other affordances" to enable them to complete their studies, there is a dedicated office on campus (and this holds true for virtually every educational institution in the US) that helps equip those students with the software tools they require to get the job done, and so they could be steered towards any number of browser plug-ins that exist, and further counseled about @longdesc, and how to access the information provided that way.

Is this a specialty "edge-case" - why yes it is, so what? Does it make it any less valid? There are hundreds of thousands of non-sighted students in schools each year that would benefit from this, and Book Publishers don't have unfettered freedom to do as they please with content that is delivered to them; yet they also have obligations (certainly in the US) to accommodate their non-sighted users, so these content authors have to tread a very fine line, and @longdesc is a tool that allows them to do just that.

Not every brush stroke needs to be a sweeping stroke...

> >> Reporting implementation status information for all features,
> perhaps
> >> with a note about alternative techniques, would be better.
> >
> >
> > indeed. And I say that knowing that any such information is itself
> likely to
> > be only half-right soon.
> I think it's critical that if we present such information we commit to
> updating it. This is a similar proposal to keeping a site like
> caniuse.com updated.

Funny you should mention that Ben. Since you bring it up, I can state that currently there is a Joint WCAG & PF Task Force for HTML5 and WAI-ARIA WCAG Techniques (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012JanMar/0011.html) that is looking to update these kinds of techniques. 

Since you believe it is critical to keep this type of information up-to-date, I hope that you would be happy to lend a hand there, given that Joshue O'Connor and James Nurthen are in desperate need of assistance in this area. Both have been CC'd on this note, and I am sure you could reach out to either of them to see how to assist. 
(Background: http://john.foliot.ca/csun-2012-recap/#ought) 


Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 00:20:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:27 UTC