W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2011

Re: longdesc verbiage

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 19:03:39 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTikTj3xJd4wZicgczuKM6amAHRK=tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi John,

Thanks for your reply.

> Ah, didn't know you were expecting a specific response. This looks fine
> Laura; the whole CP is in great shape. Kudos!

Thanks for checking it.

> (one small observation, and certainly not a substantive issue: under Use
> Cases, from a formatting perspective would they not render better as an
> unordered list:
>
> "They include:
>   * Describing a Logo,
>   * Describing a Cartoon,
>   * Describing Artwork,
>   * Describing Screenshots,
>   * Describing a Chart,
>   * Describing a Photograph,
>   * Describing an Email Banner,
>   * Describing Illustrations,
>   * Facilitating etext Image Descriptions,
>   * Describing etext Images,
>   * and Describing a Newspaper Image.
>
> Other use cases have also been identified."
>
> Again however, not a big deal either way... I just like lists <grin>.)

I like lists too. I had it as a list before the modularization. But as
I was trying to conserve space I changed it to a sentence. I'll change
it back.

Do you think we should keep the images in the rendering spec text or
delete them?

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:04:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:38 GMT