Gez wrote: > My issue with this is that by addressing the needs of all user groups, > the group that summary was originally intended for will be left out. I > can't imagine many authors writing a long description that contains > things that visually obvious. I don't see the purpose of introducing a > new element to do something that can already be done. The danger is *replacing* the attribute with a new element is that it can harm the user group the attribute was trying to help. A new element could possibly be considered in *addition* to retaining the attribute. But that would be a different change proposal. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. CarlsonReceived on Friday, 26 February 2010 11:03:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:02 GMT