W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > May 2008


From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 22:07:50 +0100
Message-Id: <5A3319DB-752C-4F93-ACD4-B85AE8D4EEA7@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org

I can't seem to subscribe to the group, thus I cannot easily discuss:

Please specify the appropriate venue.

Note that I do not believe that "leaving it to the reader" is really  
the best characterization of my views. I won't go into detail until  
we settle on a proper forum, but I believe that my approach is  
compliant with the GRDDL spec and is appropriate for the  
circumstances and that providing XSLT (in this circumstance) is an  
anti-pattern on many levels (I would say this of POWDER too, actually).

This should not be confused with my being anti-GRDDL, or even, in a  
variety of circumstances, with being anti-online XSLT for GRDDL. One  
clear case is the use of "semantic stylesheets" for documents with ad  
hoc extensions (or variant transformations).

This could happen even in an OWL/XML document. For example, instead  
of providing a transformation of *all* the axioms, I may want to only  
provide the subclass relations.

Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 21:05:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:13 UTC