Re: OWL/XML and GRDDL

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> the OWL WG published a WD of a new XML syntax for OWL,
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-xml-serialization-20080411/
>
> The intent is to provide this in a GRDDL enabled form.
>
> Is there anyone who would be happy and able to help with such a task?
I am rather busy finishing my dissertation right now so I can not help 
with anything right now, but I think this is highly admirable and ideal 
use of GRDDL (as is the POWDER use), and would not leave it as an 
exercise to the reader :)

Do keep us updated!

> Note - there is currently extensive debate about this task, see the 
> OWL WG mailing list ...
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008May/index.html#msg71 
>
>
> One of the more interesting ideas conceptually is that the normative 
> specification is given by the rec track docs, and in some sense, at 
> least one of the GRDDL transformation property arcs should specify 
> those documents as giving the transformation. (At least one member of 
> the group sees positive advantage in only doing that and not linking 
> to informative XSLT code, but leaving that as an exercise for the reader)
>
> Help and/or advice would be appreciated ....
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>