W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: RDFa - GRDDL liaison

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:51:51 -0500
Message-ID: <461D1227.9070809@w3.org>
To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Fabien Gandon wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Two weeks ago we discussed the RDFa - GRDDL liaison.
> Here are two pointers in case someone on this list missed them:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/#sec5
>

Ah... yes, I hadn't read that carefully. I see now...

"One valid use case is to use GRDDL to extract RDF from an XHTML+RDFa 
document. Effectively, GRDDL acts as the RDFa parser in this case. The 
schema document for XHTML+RDFa can (and likely will) contain a 
namespace-level GRDDL transformation."

I'm certainly interested in the details of how that work out.
I suppose that's issue 28
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28

I don't see any actions related to that issue. I wonder if
tracker associates actions with issues. Oh well... I guess
I have enough pointers to track it.

> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaGRDDL

That seems to have much of the same content, plus discussion
of hGRDDL. I'd appreciate pointers from stuff like
"the schema document should (and likely will)..." to
relevant issues.

> Cheers,
> 


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 16:51:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:48 GMT