Fabien Gandon wrote: > > Hello, > > Two weeks ago we discussed the RDFa - GRDDL liaison. > Here are two pointers in case someone on this list missed them: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/#sec5 > Ah... yes, I hadn't read that carefully. I see now... "One valid use case is to use GRDDL to extract RDF from an XHTML+RDFa document. Effectively, GRDDL acts as the RDFa parser in this case. The schema document for XHTML+RDFa can (and likely will) contain a namespace-level GRDDL transformation." I'm certainly interested in the details of how that work out. I suppose that's issue 28 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28 I don't see any actions related to that issue. I wonder if tracker associates actions with issues. Oh well... I guess I have enough pointers to track it. > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaGRDDL That seems to have much of the same content, plus discussion of hGRDDL. I'd appreciate pointers from stuff like "the schema document should (and likely will)..." to relevant issues. > Cheers, > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 16:51:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:48 GMT