- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:08:42 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > >> <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view"> >> <link rel="transformation" href="RDFa2RDFXML.xsl"/> >> </head> > > The fact that it's a GRDDL transformation doesn't make it any less an > RDFa statement, > as far as I can tell. I agree with Brian that it "looks a little bit > broken"; What's broken about this? There's a REL that relates the current document to RDFa2RDFXML.xsl, which is a "transformation". -Ben
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 05:08:44 UTC