Dan Connolly wrote: > >> <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view"> >> <link rel="transformation" href="RDFa2RDFXML.xsl"/> >> </head> > > The fact that it's a GRDDL transformation doesn't make it any less an > RDFa statement, > as far as I can tell. I agree with Brian that it "looks a little bit > broken"; What's broken about this? There's a REL that relates the current document to RDFa2RDFXML.xsl, which is a "transformation". -BenReceived on Thursday, 14 December 2006 05:08:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT