W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: Review of testlist1#rdfa1

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:05:37 -0500
Message-Id: <8732d6c7b85bb2acb5e68ecf21b322fc@w3.org>
Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>

On Dec 13, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Fabien Gandon wrote:
> McBride, Brian a écrit :
>> [...]
>> I note also that the property in this statement has a URI of
>> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmltransformation and is affected by the
>> default namespace in effect in the head of the source document.  I 
>> think
>> the test case accurately reflects the spec, but that still looks a bit
>> broken to me.
>>
> In fact this triple should not exist at all, it is due to the fact 
> that my XSLT transformation (RDFa2RDFXML) interprets the following 
> XHTML as an RDFa statement while it is the GRDDL declaration
>
> <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view">
>    <link rel="transformation" href="RDFa2RDFXML.xsl"/>
> </head>

The fact that it's a GRDDL transformation doesn't make it any less an 
RDFa statement,
as far as I can tell. I agree with Brian that it "looks a little bit 
broken"; I said as much
to the RDFa editors in response to their request for feedback, but they 
haven't changed
the RDFa design, as far as I know.

Re: Using the CLASS attribute - Request for Feedback
12 Oct 2006
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Oct/0035


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 05:05:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT