W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2006

agenda: GRDDL WG weekly 6 Dec 11aET

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:03:47 -0600
To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1165341827.3997.1938.camel@dirk>

Harry prepared an agenda...
  Revision: 1.67 $ of $Date: 2006/12/05 07:02:22

Here's a text copy..
     1. Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-12-06T11:00-0500 
              * Zakim teleconference bridge: +1.617.761.6200 code:GRDDL 
              * chair: HarryH
              * scribe: danja (carried from last week) 
                      * supplementary IRC chat: #grddl-wg on irc.w3.org
                        port 6665 
              * PROPOSED: to approve GRDDL WG Weekly -- 22 Nov 2006 as a
                true record
              * roll call, comments on the agenda.
              * regrets: Chime
     2. Test cases for GRDDL with XML documents 
              * ACTION Chime: to verify
                http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#projectsSpreadsheet note progress in #swig
              * PROPOSED: to approve testlist1#title_author (the Jimmy
                Hendrix example) and testlist1#rdfa1
     3. [#issue-output-formats] [DONE?] whether GRDDL transformations
        may produce RDF in a format other than RDF/XML 
              * ACTION: [DONE?] DanJa to provide XSLT transformation
                from Atom to N3,and one case where it works. See his
     4. GRDDL and (non-XML) HTML 
        see GRDDL and HTML Norman Gray (Tuesday, 14 November) to
              * ACTON: Fabien to add a sentence about non-XML HTML in
                the Use Case document. 2 weeks
     5. Cross-document Introduction 
              * ACTION: bwm to have a closer look at the Stephen King
                Example in the spec. See the change to Jimmy Hendrix and
                MusicBrainz in DanC's message: message
              * ACTION: Danja to suggest wording changes in light of
                recent comment on cross-document introduction 2 weeks
     6. [#issue-mt-ns] 
              * ACTION: Murray to write up the pros and cons of
                different approaches: [DONE] See his message.
              * PROPOSED: We try to reach consensus on one of the
                methodologies Murray put forward in his message.
              * ACTION: iand to construct a content negotiation test
                case (3 weeks)
     7. [#issue-base-param] 
              * ACTION: DanC to enumerate options for base issue, pick
                one, and propose it in the form of a test case. See his
                suggestion to pass it as a parameter and bwm's
                suggestion that we don't . (2 weeks)
              * ACTION: chime to help danc with test cases on base param
                issue (3 weeks)
     8. Primer Document 
              * ACTION: Harry and Brian to rewrite second part of primer
                to use Brian and Dan's instance data. See message from
                Brian and message from Harry. (3 weeks)
     9. GRDDL Spec: General issues 
              * ACTION: DanC to create a "normative only" view of the
                GRDDL spec. Progress: spec_lean Revision: 1.2 of
                2006/11/10 07:39:56 (3 weeks)
              * ACTION: DanC to add a sample implementation appendix to
                the GRDDL spec. Progress: Re: Notes on implementing
                GRDDL from scratch (3 weeks)

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 18:03:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC