Re: agenda: GRDDL WG weekly 6 Dec 11aET

Regrets, this schedule is definitely not working out for me :(

Two thoughts on the agenda as I catch up with the various debates.

- great that we are allowing other output formats

- GRDDL on non-XML HTML. This seems like a big issue. If we really mean
to parse microformats, then we cannot assume well-formed XML, right?
This is particularly important given that HTML tag soup is still very
much in our future, according to the latest rumblings.

-Ben


Dan Connolly wrote:
> Harry prepared an agenda...
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
>   Revision: 1.67 $ of $Date: 2006/12/05 07:02:22
> 
> Here's a text copy..
> GRDDL WG Weekly
>      1. Convene GRDDL WG meeting of 2006-12-06T11:00-0500 
>               * Zakim teleconference bridge: +1.617.761.6200 code:GRDDL 
>               * chair: HarryH
>               * scribe: danja (carried from last week) 
>                       * supplementary IRC chat: #grddl-wg on irc.w3.org
>                         port 6665 
>               * PROPOSED: to approve GRDDL WG Weekly -- 22 Nov 2006 as a
>                 true record
>               * roll call, comments on the agenda.
>               * regrets: Chime
>      2. Test cases for GRDDL with XML documents 
>               * ACTION Chime: to verify
>                 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#projectsSpreadsheet note progress in #swig
>               * PROPOSED: to approve testlist1#title_author (the Jimmy
>                 Hendrix example) and testlist1#rdfa1
>      3. [#issue-output-formats] [DONE?] whether GRDDL transformations
>         may produce RDF in a format other than RDF/XML 
>               * ACTION: [DONE?] DanJa to provide XSLT transformation
>                 from Atom to N3,and one case where it works. See his
>                 message.
>      4. GRDDL and (non-XML) HTML 
>         
>         see GRDDL and HTML Norman Gray (Tuesday, 14 November) to
>         public-grdd-comments.
>         
>               * ACTON: Fabien to add a sentence about non-XML HTML in
>                 the Use Case document. 2 weeks
>      5. Cross-document Introduction 
>               * ACTION: bwm to have a closer look at the Stephen King
>                 Example in the spec. See the change to Jimmy Hendrix and
>                 MusicBrainz in DanC's message: message
>               * ACTION: Danja to suggest wording changes in light of
>                 recent comment on cross-document introduction 2 weeks
>      6. [#issue-mt-ns] 
>               * ACTION: Murray to write up the pros and cons of
>                 different approaches: [DONE] See his message.
>               * PROPOSED: We try to reach consensus on one of the
>                 methodologies Murray put forward in his message.
>               * ACTION: iand to construct a content negotiation test
>                 case (3 weeks)
>      7. [#issue-base-param] 
>               * ACTION: DanC to enumerate options for base issue, pick
>                 one, and propose it in the form of a test case. See his
>                 suggestion to pass it as a parameter and bwm's
>                 suggestion that we don't . (2 weeks)
>               * ACTION: chime to help danc with test cases on base param
>                 issue (3 weeks)
>      8. Primer Document 
>               * ACTION: Harry and Brian to rewrite second part of primer
>                 to use Brian and Dan's instance data. See message from
>                 Brian and message from Harry. (3 weeks)
>      9. GRDDL Spec: General issues 
>               * ACTION: DanC to create a "normative only" view of the
>                 GRDDL spec. Progress: spec_lean Revision: 1.2 of
>                 2006/11/10 07:39:56 (3 weeks)
>               * ACTION: DanC to add a sample implementation appendix to
>                 the GRDDL spec. Progress: Re: Notes on implementing
>                 GRDDL from scratch (3 weeks)
>

Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 21:05:49 UTC