W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Comments on GRDDL (using 3rd-party XML schemas with GRDDL) [OK?]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:21:32 -0500
To: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, w3c-xsl-query@w3.org
Message-Id: <1182799292.6367.912.camel@pav>

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 13:48 -0400, Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
> 
> Hi Dan, 
> 
> The WGs believes that the specification supports both the use of
> schema documents that are retrievable from the namespace name and
> schema documents that are pointed to from the document itself.

Right.

>  We do not believe that there a provision for using other schema
> documents (e.g. schema documents retrieved from a local repository). 

Right.

>  If this capability is not provided, then we believe that this should
> be mentioned in the specification. 

In my 30 April reply,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0038.html
I explained that 3rd-party claims are not among the use cases
GRDDL is designed for. And yet you ask again that we mention it,
and again without any justification. There is an infinite number
of use cases that GRDDL is not designed to cover; I think that's
implicitly clear. I don't see any reason to mention this one
in particular.

If you provided some justification for your request, I could
perhaps consider it further with the Working Group.

As it is, I hope you find this response satisfactory. 

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 19:21:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT