RE: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be required if needed [OK?]

Yes, this satisfactorily addresses issue-dbooth-9c (Base URI should only
be required).

Thank you

David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent
the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:29 PM
> To: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org; McBride, Brian
> Subject: Re: issue-dbooth-9c: Base URI should only be 
> required if needed [OK?]
> 
> 
> OOPS - this should have been sent first!
> 
> ========================================
> 
> Dear David
> 
> the GRDDL WG has asked me to write text to clarify the interaction 
> between RFC 3986, particularly section 5.1, and the GRDDL 
> specification.
> 
> The draft text can be found at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/base
> 
> particularly relevant to your comment 9c is the text at
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/base#pipeline
> 
> and the paragraph
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/base#no-retrieval-uri
> 
> The intent is to include this text in the GRDDL suite of documents: 
> however it is not clear yet where. It is also unclear yet 
> whether any of 
> the text will be normative.
> 
> Personally, I am suggesting this text should be included in the GRDDL 
> Specification document, as an informative appendix.
> 
> Please indicate whether inclusion of this text (specifically the 
> subsection and paragraph indicated) addresses your concerns 
> about base URIs.
> 
> thanks
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> -- 
> Hewlett-Packard Limited
> registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 19:00:16 UTC