W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: W3C GLD WG Thur 8-Mar-2012

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:04:15 +0000
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F9B4743F-90FC-40F4-868D-2B0C965AE25B@deri.org>
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>

> Does making them OPEN imply we have accepted them for consideration in the working group?


My interpretation:

RAISED … some WG member thinks this *might* be an issue
OPEN … the WG has acknowledged it as an issue and commits to resolve it one way or the other


Cheers,
	   Michael

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel.: +353 91 495730
WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i

On 9 Mar 2012, at 14:01, Dave Reynolds wrote:

> On 09/03/12 13:19, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 18:20 +0000, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>>> Sorry to have missed the call (I did say I was "at risk").
>>> 
>>> I see the following in the minutes:
>>> 
>>> "PROPOSED: Publish Data Cube Vocabular Spec FPWD, after adding a
>>> reference to ISSUE-32 (worked out between lbermudez and the editors)"
>>> 
>>> What's the reason for referencing ISSUE-32 specifically?
>>> 
>>> I could see some value in an Editor's Note pointing that there are a
>>> number of logged issues that *may* be addressed in future versions.
>>> However, I didn't follow the rationale for treating ISSUE-32 differently
>>> from the others.
>> 
>> Simply that Luis thought it was important to do so (and no one saw a
>> problem with doing so).
>> 
>> I think it would be good practice, actually, the make sure every open
>> ISSUE is mentioned in some editor's note in the relevant document,
>> although maybe in a few cases there's no way to do that clearly.  A link
>> like http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/products/3 could also nicely
>> appear in the SOTD, as standard practice.
>> 
>> Tangentially, I note we haven't actually, as a group, done the work of
>> transitioning RAISED issues to OPEN issues.   Perhaps folks should look
>> down the list of all the RAISED issues and comment on whether there are
>> any they think do NOT require some discussion, understanding, and a
>> decision by the Working Group...
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised
> 
> Hmm. So what is the semantics of OPEN?
> 
> After discussion with Richard I used the tracker to log all issues we were aware of that we might *potentially* want to consider during GLD.
> 
> As mentioned in email (point 1 of [1]) this includes issues that we may not choose to tackle within the scope of this working group.
> 
> Does making them OPEN imply we have accepted them for consideration in the working group?
> 
> If so I think they should stay in RAISED for now.
> 
> Dave
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Feb/0111.html
> 
>> 
>>    -- Sandro
>> 
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 08/03/12 16:08, Thomas, George (OS/ASA/OCIO/OEA) wrote:
>>>> Minutes from today’s GLD-WG call are here;
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-03-08
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks Bernadette for chairing and all for your engagement and ongoing
>>>> contributions!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> George
>>>> 
>>>> *From:*Bernadette Hyland [mailto:bhyland@3roundstones.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:27 PM
>>>> *To:* W3C public GLD WG WG
>>>> *Cc:* GLD Chairs
>>>> *Subject:* W3C GLD WG Thur 8-Mar-2012
>>>> 
>>>> Greetings GLD'ers,
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies for the tardiness of this agenda ... busy days.
>>>> 
>>>> We'll have our weekly GLD-WG telecon this *Thursday 08-Mar-2012*
>>>> 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00-11:00 Boston, 7:00-8:00 San Francisco,
>>>> 15:00-16:00 London, 16:00-17:00 Paris).
>>>> 
>>>> Please see the agenda page [2] for call-in info. This week we continue
>>>> our focus on FPWD release progress and vote on several vocabs that are
>>>> ready to be published.
>>>> 
>>>> Chair: Bernadette, Scribe: Phil Archer, Alternate Scribe: TBD
>>>> 
>>>> Looking forward to speaking with you all Thursday.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Bernadette, George and Sandro
>>>> 
>>>> [1] _http://www.w3.org/2011/gld_
>>>> 
>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120308
>>>> 
>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/scribe.html
>>>> 
>>>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Scribes
>>>> 
>>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Regrets
>>>> 
>>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=47663
>>>> 
>>>> _Housekeeping/Admin:_
>>>> 
>>>> * Please familiarize yourself with "Scribe 101" [3] if you haven't
>>>> scribed before or in a long time.
>>>> 
>>>> * We really need to update the Scribes [4] page. Please add yourself or
>>>> you'll be automatically added.
>>>> 
>>>> * If you know you'll be away, please update Regrets [5] page (especially
>>>> if you’re designated as a scribe for some meeting).
>>>> 
>>>> * Participants that have recently joined the GLD WG, we encourage you to
>>>> add your contact details so people can connect with you [6].
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 14:04:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:03:31 UTC