W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: W3C GLD WG Thur 8-Mar-2012

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:01:52 +0000
Message-ID: <4F5A0D50.3070609@gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
On 09/03/12 13:19, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 18:20 +0000, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> Sorry to have missed the call (I did say I was "at risk").
>>
>> I see the following in the minutes:
>>
>> "PROPOSED: Publish Data Cube Vocabular Spec FPWD, after adding a
>> reference to ISSUE-32 (worked out between lbermudez and the editors)"
>>
>> What's the reason for referencing ISSUE-32 specifically?
>>
>> I could see some value in an Editor's Note pointing that there are a
>> number of logged issues that *may* be addressed in future versions.
>> However, I didn't follow the rationale for treating ISSUE-32 differently
>> from the others.
>
> Simply that Luis thought it was important to do so (and no one saw a
> problem with doing so).
>
> I think it would be good practice, actually, the make sure every open
> ISSUE is mentioned in some editor's note in the relevant document,
> although maybe in a few cases there's no way to do that clearly.  A link
> like http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/products/3 could also nicely
> appear in the SOTD, as standard practice.
>
> Tangentially, I note we haven't actually, as a group, done the work of
> transitioning RAISED issues to OPEN issues.   Perhaps folks should look
> down the list of all the RAISED issues and comment on whether there are
> any they think do NOT require some discussion, understanding, and a
> decision by the Working Group...
> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised

Hmm. So what is the semantics of OPEN?

After discussion with Richard I used the tracker to log all issues we 
were aware of that we might *potentially* want to consider during GLD.

As mentioned in email (point 1 of [1]) this includes issues that we may 
not choose to tackle within the scope of this working group.

Does making them OPEN imply we have accepted them for consideration in 
the working group?

If so I think they should stay in RAISED for now.

Dave

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Feb/0111.html

>
>     -- Sandro
>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> On 08/03/12 16:08, Thomas, George (OS/ASA/OCIO/OEA) wrote:
>>> Minutes from today’s GLD-WG call are here;
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-03-08
>>>
>>> Thanks Bernadette for chairing and all for your engagement and ongoing
>>> contributions!
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> George
>>>
>>> *From:*Bernadette Hyland [mailto:bhyland@3roundstones.com]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:27 PM
>>> *To:* W3C public GLD WG WG
>>> *Cc:* GLD Chairs
>>> *Subject:* W3C GLD WG Thur 8-Mar-2012
>>>
>>> Greetings GLD'ers,
>>>
>>> Apologies for the tardiness of this agenda ... busy days.
>>>
>>> We'll have our weekly GLD-WG telecon this *Thursday 08-Mar-2012*
>>> 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00-11:00 Boston, 7:00-8:00 San Francisco,
>>> 15:00-16:00 London, 16:00-17:00 Paris).
>>>
>>> Please see the agenda page [2] for call-in info. This week we continue
>>> our focus on FPWD release progress and vote on several vocabs that are
>>> ready to be published.
>>>
>>> Chair: Bernadette, Scribe: Phil Archer, Alternate Scribe: TBD
>>>
>>> Looking forward to speaking with you all Thursday.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Bernadette, George and Sandro
>>>
>>> [1] _http://www.w3.org/2011/gld_
>>>
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120308
>>>
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/scribe.html
>>>
>>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Scribes
>>>
>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Regrets
>>>
>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=47663
>>>
>>> _Housekeeping/Admin:_
>>>
>>> * Please familiarize yourself with "Scribe 101" [3] if you haven't
>>> scribed before or in a long time.
>>>
>>> * We really need to update the Scribes [4] page. Please add yourself or
>>> you'll be automatically added.
>>>
>>> * If you know you'll be away, please update Regrets [5] page (especially
>>> if you’re designated as a scribe for some meeting).
>>>
>>> * Participants that have recently joined the GLD WG, we encourage you to
>>> add your contact details so people can connect with you [6].
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 14:02:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:03:31 UTC