W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: W3C GLD WG Thur 8-Mar-2012

From: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:31:11 -0500
Cc: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <04833DF7-5EC3-4094-B8A3-A6856BF3A60C@3roundstones.com>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
+1 Michael.  That is my understanding as well. We'll tidy up at next meeting which is going to be 90 minutes next week.

Bernadette



On Mar 9, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:

> 
>> Does making them OPEN imply we have accepted them for consideration in the working group?
> 
> 
> My interpretation:
> 
> RAISED … some WG member thinks this *might* be an issue
> OPEN … the WG has acknowledged it as an issue and commits to resolve it one way or the other
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 	   Michael
> 
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel.: +353 91 495730
> WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i
> 
> On 9 Mar 2012, at 14:01, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> 
>> On 09/03/12 13:19, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 18:20 +0000, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>>>> Sorry to have missed the call (I did say I was "at risk").
>>>> 
>>>> I see the following in the minutes:
>>>> 
>>>> "PROPOSED: Publish Data Cube Vocabular Spec FPWD, after adding a
>>>> reference to ISSUE-32 (worked out between lbermudez and the editors)"
>>>> 
>>>> What's the reason for referencing ISSUE-32 specifically?
>>>> 
>>>> I could see some value in an Editor's Note pointing that there are a
>>>> number of logged issues that *may* be addressed in future versions.
>>>> However, I didn't follow the rationale for treating ISSUE-32 differently
>>>> from the others.
>>> 
>>> Simply that Luis thought it was important to do so (and no one saw a
>>> problem with doing so).
>>> 
>>> I think it would be good practice, actually, the make sure every open
>>> ISSUE is mentioned in some editor's note in the relevant document,
>>> although maybe in a few cases there's no way to do that clearly.  A link
>>> like http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/products/3 could also nicely
>>> appear in the SOTD, as standard practice.
>>> 
>>> Tangentially, I note we haven't actually, as a group, done the work of
>>> transitioning RAISED issues to OPEN issues.   Perhaps folks should look
>>> down the list of all the RAISED issues and comment on whether there are
>>> any they think do NOT require some discussion, understanding, and a
>>> decision by the Working Group...
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised
>> 
>> Hmm. So what is the semantics of OPEN?
>> 
>> After discussion with Richard I used the tracker to log all issues we were aware of that we might *potentially* want to consider during GLD.
>> 
>> As mentioned in email (point 1 of [1]) this includes issues that we may not choose to tackle within the scope of this working group.
>> 
>> Does making them OPEN imply we have accepted them for consideration in the working group?
>> 
>> If so I think they should stay in RAISED for now.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Feb/0111.html
>> 
>>> 
>>>   -- Sandro
>>> 
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 08/03/12 16:08, Thomas, George (OS/ASA/OCIO/OEA) wrote:
>>>>> Minutes from today’s GLD-WG call are here;
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-03-08
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks Bernadette for chairing and all for your engagement and ongoing
>>>>> contributions!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> George
>>>>> 
>>>>> *From:*Bernadette Hyland [mailto:bhyland@3roundstones.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:27 PM
>>>>> *To:* W3C public GLD WG WG
>>>>> *Cc:* GLD Chairs
>>>>> *Subject:* W3C GLD WG Thur 8-Mar-2012
>>>>> 
>>>>> Greetings GLD'ers,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Apologies for the tardiness of this agenda ... busy days.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We'll have our weekly GLD-WG telecon this *Thursday 08-Mar-2012*
>>>>> 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00-11:00 Boston, 7:00-8:00 San Francisco,
>>>>> 15:00-16:00 London, 16:00-17:00 Paris).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please see the agenda page [2] for call-in info. This week we continue
>>>>> our focus on FPWD release progress and vote on several vocabs that are
>>>>> ready to be published.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chair: Bernadette, Scribe: Phil Archer, Alternate Scribe: TBD
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking forward to speaking with you all Thursday.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bernadette, George and Sandro
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] _http://www.w3.org/2011/gld_
>>>>> 
>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120308
>>>>> 
>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/scribe.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Scribes
>>>>> 
>>>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Regrets
>>>>> 
>>>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=47663
>>>>> 
>>>>> _Housekeeping/Admin:_
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Please familiarize yourself with "Scribe 101" [3] if you haven't
>>>>> scribed before or in a long time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> * We really need to update the Scribes [4] page. Please add yourself or
>>>>> you'll be automatically added.
>>>>> 
>>>>> * If you know you'll be away, please update Regrets [5] page (especially
>>>>> if you’re designated as a scribe for some meeting).
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Participants that have recently joined the GLD WG, we encourage you to
>>>>> add your contact details so people can connect with you [6].
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 17:31:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:03:31 UTC