W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Data Cube edits

From: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:12:47 -0500
Cc: public-gld-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <33FD2D27-827A-416B-8F25-A0CF82A0F488@3roundstones.com>
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
Thanks for reminding me of the exact details, you're correct.  We voted on 23-Feb re: the ORG vocab and I agreed to prep email request to Thomas @ W3C to move to official FPWD.  

I'll put the Data Cube vote on *this* Thursday's agenda and we'll vote.  It order to help everyone keep it straight, I'll wait to send the request(s) for official FPWD review until after the 8-Mar telecon.  Work for you?

Thanks again,
Bernadette

PS.  No telecon was held last week.

On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:

> On 06/03/12 15:48, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>> This was discussed in a previous GLD WG call & I'm planning to send the
>> email to W3C staff to request official move to FPWD today (which I think
>> is required procedurally.)
> 
> Was there a call last week after all then?
> 
> The week before (Feb 23) we voted to publish ORG and agreed we would vote on Data Cube, after these edits, but didn't actually vote. [1]
> 
>> In any event, the process is moving forward
>> in March. Thanks for your patience.
>> 
>> Thank you very much for your work and keeping us on track. Much appreciated.
> 
> n.p.
> 
> I mention it because I believe W3C staff will want a pointer to the working group resolution, which I didn't think we had, yet.
> 
> Dave
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-02-23
> 
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Bernadette Hyland, co-chair
>> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
>> /Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld//
>> 
>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> 
>>> Since I'm "at risk" for this weeks meeting I just wanted to confirm
>>> that the Data Cube working draft [1] has been updated to reflect the
>>> editorial suggestions made by Curran Kelleher [2].
>>> 
>>> As noted in [3] I'm assuming that since the Data Cube document has
>>> been open to public review for some time, and given Curran's review
>>> comments, that a further formal working group review is not needed. In
>>> which case I believe this is ready for voting on FPWD. Richard, do you
>>> agree?
>>> 
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html
>>> [2]
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2012Feb/0000.html
>>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Mar/0001.html
>>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 17:13:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:03:31 UTC