W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Data Cube edits

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:38:27 +0000
Message-ID: <4F564B93.20107@gmail.com>
To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
CC: public-gld-wg@w3.org
Hi Bernadette,

On 06/03/12 17:12, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Thanks for reminding me of the exact details, you're correct. We voted
> on 23-Feb re: the ORG vocab and I agreed to prep email request to Thomas
> @ W3C to move to official FPWD.
>
> I'll put the Data Cube vote on *this* Thursday's agenda and we'll vote.
> It order to help everyone keep it straight, I'll wait to send the
> request(s) for official FPWD review until after the 8-Mar telecon. Work
> for you?

Yes, that's clear. Thanks :)

Dave

>
> Thanks again,
> Bernadette
>
> PS. No telecon was held last week.
>
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/12 15:48, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>> This was discussed in a previous GLD WG call & I'm planning to send the
>>> email to W3C staff to request official move to FPWD today (which I think
>>> is required procedurally.)
>>
>> Was there a call last week after all then?
>>
>> The week before (Feb 23) we voted to publish ORG and agreed we would
>> vote on Data Cube, after these edits, but didn't actually vote. [1]
>>
>>> In any event, the process is moving forward
>>> in March. Thanks for your patience.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your work and keeping us on track. Much
>>> appreciated.
>>
>> n.p.
>>
>> I mention it because I believe W3C staff will want a pointer to the
>> working group resolution, which I didn't think we had, yet.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-02-23
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bernadette Hyland, co-chair
>>> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
>>> /Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld//
>>>
>>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since I'm "at risk" for this weeks meeting I just wanted to confirm
>>>> that the Data Cube working draft [1] has been updated to reflect the
>>>> editorial suggestions made by Curran Kelleher [2].
>>>>
>>>> As noted in [3] I'm assuming that since the Data Cube document has
>>>> been open to public review for some time, and given Curran's review
>>>> comments, that a further formal working group review is not needed. In
>>>> which case I believe this is ready for voting on FPWD. Richard, do you
>>>> agree?
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html
>>>> [2]
>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2012Feb/0000.html
>>>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Mar/0001.html
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 17:39:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:03:31 UTC