Re: CfC: approve Errata for Geo v1

That looks like a meat solution. Thanks Dom!

/m



On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:

> On ven., 2014-02-14 at 10:56 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> > Attached yet another version of the errata, that removes the indication
> > of removing [NoInterfaceObject], and adds that NavigatorGeolocation
> > would be better rewritten as a partial interface.
>
> And another version again, taking into account my latest message on
> [Clamp] and Infinity [1] — I have thus abandoned the idea of removing
> the mentions of Infinity in the prose.
>
> To see where we stand with regard to the edits I brought since the first
> version of the errata in my Call for Consensus, see
> http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%
> 2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-geolocation%2F2014Feb%2Fatt-0012%
> 2Fgeoapi-errata.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%
> 2Fpublic-geolocation%2F2014Feb%2Fatt-0022%2Fgeoapi-errata.html
>
> Dom
>
>
> 1.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2014Feb/0021.html
>