Re: CfC: approve Errata for Geo v1

Ah, s/meat/neat/

/m



On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk <
mvanouwerkerk@google.com> wrote:

> That looks like a meat solution. Thanks Dom!
>
> /m
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:
>
>> On ven., 2014-02-14 at 10:56 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>> > Attached yet another version of the errata, that removes the indication
>> > of removing [NoInterfaceObject], and adds that NavigatorGeolocation
>> > would be better rewritten as a partial interface.
>>
>> And another version again, taking into account my latest message on
>> [Clamp] and Infinity [1] — I have thus abandoned the idea of removing
>> the mentions of Infinity in the prose.
>>
>> To see where we stand with regard to the edits I brought since the first
>> version of the errata in my Call for Consensus, see
>> http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%
>> 2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-geolocation%2F2014Feb%2Fatt-0012%
>> 2Fgeoapi-errata.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%
>> 2Fpublic-geolocation%2F2014Feb%2Fatt-0022%2Fgeoapi-errata.html
>>
>> Dom
>>
>>
>> 1.
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2014Feb/0021.html
>>
>
>