Dirk Schulze: > The current version of the CSS3 Transforms specification has a > section that partly redefines the 'animateTransform' element [1]. I > think it makes rather sense to add the changes to the SVG Animation > section [2] directly. This would reduce confusions for looking on > different specs just for the definition of the element itself. I am > willing to edit the SVG Animation module to interact with CSS3 > Transforms. It will mean that SVG 1.1 will not support the new > transform functions. SVG 2 on the other hand is a bit more clear and > cleaner in general and will support all transform functions of CSS3 > Transforms. I don't see any incompatibilities for SVG 1.1 so. Are > there any objections? Otherwise I will remove this section and edit > SVG directly. I think that is fine, though depending on how quickly the Web Animations spec progresses, we might need to substantially rewrite that chapter in SVG 2 anyway.Received on Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:18:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:18:42 GMT