W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [css3-transforms] remove 'animateTransform' definition from spec

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:18:04 +1000
Message-ID: <4FC02F4C.7070708@mcc.id.au>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Dirk Schulze:
> The current version of the CSS3 Transforms specification has a
> section that partly redefines the 'animateTransform' element [1]. I
> think it makes rather sense to add the changes to the SVG Animation
> section [2] directly. This would reduce confusions for looking on
> different specs just for the definition of the element itself. I am
> willing to edit the SVG Animation module to interact with CSS3
> Transforms. It will mean that SVG 1.1 will not support the new
> transform functions. SVG 2 on the other hand is a bit more clear and
> cleaner in general and will support all transform functions of CSS3
> Transforms. I don't see any incompatibilities for SVG 1.1 so. Are
> there any objections? Otherwise I will remove this section and edit
> SVG directly.

I think that is fine, though depending on how quickly the Web Animations 
spec progresses, we might need to substantially rewrite that chapter in 
SVG 2 anyway.
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:18:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 26 May 2012 01:18:42 GMT