- From: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:25:32 +0900
- To: public-fx@w3.org
(2012/05/26 6:28), Dirk Schulze wrote: > Hi, > > The current version of the CSS3 Transforms specification has a section that partly redefines the 'animateTransform' element [1]. I think it makes rather sense to add the changes to the SVG Animation section [2] directly. This would reduce confusions for looking on different specs just for the definition of the element itself. I am willing to edit the SVG Animation module to interact with CSS3 Transforms. It will mean that SVG 1.1 will not support the new transform functions. SVG 2 on the other hand is a bit more clear and cleaner in general and will support all transform functions of CSS3 Transforms. I don't see any incompatibilities for SVG 1.1 so. > Are there any objections? Otherwise I will remove this section and edit SVG directly. Sounds good. While you're at it, you could probably mark animateTransform as deprecated. There seems to be consensus that it should go. It's not needed when <animate> can target a transform list (as the Transform spec now allows) and it's confusing that it can only deal with a single transform despite targetting a list. Best regards, Brian
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 02:26:03 UTC